top of page
Search

Seasonal vs. Annual Rentals: Which Option Makes More Financial Sense in 2025?

  • Maria V.
  • Aug 27
  • 8 min read

Updated: Aug 28

Annual Rentals

1. Income Potential & Seasonality

When deciding between seasonal rentals and annual rentals, income potential and seasonal stability are two of the most important factors for investors to consider. Both models offer distinct advantages, but the returns and risks vary greatly depending on location, demand, and strategy.

Seasonal Rentals (Short-Term / Vacation Rentals)

Seasonal rentals often generate significantly higher income compared to long-term leases. By charging nightly or weekly rates, property owners can surpass what long-term tenants pay on a monthly basis. In popular tourist-heavy destinations, operators report gross annual returns of 8–12%, sometimes even higher (DIONE).

For example, a two-bedroom cabin in a ski area could fetch $500 per night, equating to nearly $15,000 per month during peak season. However, in the off-season, that same property might only earn around $5,000 per month, showcasing the strong seasonal swings in revenue (Green Forest Capital).

At the luxury end of the market, premium short-term rentals command staggering nightly rates. High-end listings with bespoke amenities such as private chefs, concierge services, or exclusive locations can charge $1,000 to $2,400 per night, generating hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual revenue if occupancy is consistently maintained (The Wall Street Journal).

Annual Rentals (Long-Term Rentals)

Annual rentals, by contrast, provide a steady and predictable income stream. For instance, a long-term tenant paying $2,800 per month would deliver $33,600 per year in consistent rental income without the dramatic seasonal fluctuations seen in vacation rentals (Green Forest Capital).

While annual rentals may not reach the same income highs as short-term luxury listings, their predictability, stability, and reduced volatility make them an attractive option for investors seeking reliable long-term cash flow.

The Trade-Off

Seasonal rentals offer the potential for higher returns but carry significant risks tied to tourism demand and off-season slumps. Annual rentals, though less lucrative during peak tourist periods, provide year-round financial security with fewer surprises.


Management Effort & Costs

2. Management Effort & Costs

When comparing seasonal rentals to annual rentals, the level of management effort and operating costs is one of the biggest distinctions. Short-term rentals demand constant oversight and expenses, while long-term rentals offer a far more passive approach.

Seasonal Rentals: High Touch, High Cost

Running a seasonal or vacation rental requires intensive day-to-day management. Hosts must handle guest communication, booking coordination, cleaning logistics, dynamic pricing, and frequent property maintenance. The constant turnover of tenants—sometimes weekly or even nightly—means more time and effort compared to annual leases

Because of the workload, many owners hire property managers, who typically charge 20–30% of monthly rental income. While this eases the burden, it significantly reduces net profitability.

In addition to management fees, seasonal rentals face several recurring operating costs, including:

  • Platform fees from booking sites such as Airbnb or VRBO (igms.com).

  • Cleaning and turnover expenses, which can accumulate quickly with frequent stays (Green Forest Capital).

  • Higher utility bills, since short-term guests often use more electricity, water, and internet.

  • Furnishing and upgrades, as properties must stay attractive and competitive in the vacation rental market.

Annual Rentals: Low Maintenance, Predictable Costs

Annual rentals, on the other hand, are often described as “set-and-forget” investments. Landlord responsibilities usually involve quarterly maintenance, collecting rent, and occasional tenant screening. The reduced tenant turnover minimizes the need for constant management.

If outsourced, professional property management fees for long-term rentals typically range from 8–12% of monthly rent, far lower than short-term rental management costs. Vacancy risks are also relatively minor, averaging 5–8% annually, as tenants often sign one-year or multi-year leases (Green Forest Capital).

The Trade-Off

Seasonal rentals can generate higher gross income but require significant effort, higher costs, and active oversight. Annual rentals, by contrast, may yield lower returns but provide ease of management, reduced expenses, and steady performance—making them better suited for investors seeking passive income.


Regulatory & Market Risks

3. Regulatory & Market Risks

Investors must consider regulatory requirements and market volatility when choosing between seasonal and annual rentals. These factors can significantly impact income, operational complexity, and long-term profitability.

Seasonal Rentals: Regulatory Challenges and Market Volatility

Short-term rentals often face increasing scrutiny from local authorities. For example:

  • Los Angeles limits short-term rentals to 120 days per year unless additional permits are obtained (Justin Borges).

  • Phoenix requires hosts to secure permits, costing around $250 per year, and imposes restrictions on occupancy limits and zoning compliance

Beyond regulations, seasonal rentals are highly sensitive to market fluctuations. Tourism cycles, economic conditions, and global events can cause dramatic swings in demand, directly affecting occupancy and revenue

Annual Rentals: Stability and Fewer Regulatory Hurdles

Annual rentals are generally subject to standard landlord-tenant laws, which are more consistent and predictable across locations. Unlike vacation rentals, long-term leases provide stable market demand, as housing is always needed regardless of tourism trends or seasonal cycles. This makes annual rentals more resilient during economic uncertainty (Green Forest Capital).

The Trade-Off

While seasonal rentals can achieve higher peak earnings, they carry significant regulatory risk and income volatility. Annual rentals, although offering lower maximum returns, provide predictable income, simpler compliance, and long-term market stability.


Taxes, Insurance & Financial Considerations

4. Taxes, Insurance & Financial Considerations

Financial planning is a crucial aspect of real estate investing. Taxes, insurance, and other financial considerations differ significantly between seasonal (short-term) and annual (long-term) rentals, impacting net profitability and risk exposure.

Seasonal Rentals: Higher Complexity and Costs

Owners of short-term rentals can deduct a variety of expenses, including mortgage interest, utilities, platform fees, and property depreciation. However, depending on the level of involvement, income may be classified as self-employment income, which could subject owners to additional taxes

Insurance for seasonal rentals is typically more expensive, as standard homeowner policies often do not cover frequent short-term guests. Specialized vacation rental policies or host guarantees are usually required, adding another layer of cost.

Annual Rentals: Simpler Tax Treatment and Lower Insurance Costs

In contrast, income from annual rentals is usually considered passive, simplifying tax reporting and minimizing self-employment exposure. Standard landlord insurance generally provides adequate coverage for both property damage and loss of rental income, making it more affordable and straightforward than policies for short-term rentals (Green Forest Capital).

The Trade-Off

Seasonal rentals offer potentially higher deductions and write-offs, but also come with greater complexity, higher insurance premiums, and potential self-employment tax liability. Annual rentals are easier to manage financially, with lower insurance costs and simpler tax treatment, appealing to investors seeking predictability and reduced administrative burden.


5. Profitability Metrics

Evaluating profitability is essential for any real estate investment. Key metrics differ between seasonal rentals and annual rentals, reflecting variations in cash flow, occupancy, and overall risk.

Seasonal Rentals: High Potential, Higher Risk

For short-term or vacation rentals, important profitability indicators include Cash-on-Cash Return and Occupancy Rate. For example, a property earning $30,000 per year on a $50,000 investment achieves a 60% return, highlighting the high earning potential of seasonal rentals (Green Forest Capital).

However, maintaining profitability requires strong occupancy. Most vacation properties need to sustain 70% or higher occupancy to cover operational costs and achieve target returns (Green Forest Capital). The combination of high revenue potential and occupancy sensitivity makes seasonal rentals profitable but riskier.

Annual Rentals: Steady and Predictable Returns

Long-term rentals generally experience lower turnover and manageable operating costs, which translates to consistent occupancy levels—often 90% or higher. While annual rentals typically generate more modest returns compared to seasonal properties, their stability and predictability make them reliable income generators with minimal management effort (Green Forest Capital).

The Trade-Off

Seasonal rentals can offer exceptional returns if occupancy is high and management is effective, but profitability is highly sensitive to market fluctuations. Annual rentals provide steady, lower-risk returns, making them ideal for investors prioritizing consistency and long-term financial planning.


Option Makes More Financial Sense in 2025

6. 2025 Market Context

Understanding the broader rental market is crucial for investors deciding between seasonal and annual rentals. Current trends in 2025 provide insight into supply, demand, and potential returns for both strategies.

Rental Market Tightness

The U.S. rental market remains highly competitive, with the Rental Competitiveness Index (RCI) at 74.6 and national occupancy at 93.3%. This tight market is fueled by limited rental supply and strong lease renewal rates, making long-term rentals a stable and in-demand option for investors (RentCafe).

Short-Term Rental Trends

Short-term rentals continue to show potential for higher returns, but market dynamics are shifting. The Average Daily Rate (ADR) for U.S. vacation and short-term rentals is expected to rise 2.7% in 2025, reflecting continued revenue growth for premium properties. However, occupancy rates remain relatively low at 55.3%, indicating softer demand and increasing competition in the vacation rental market (Cascadia Getaways).

Implications for Investors

For investors, these trends highlight the trade-offs between stability and high-earning potential:

  • Annual rentals benefit from high occupancy and strong tenant demand, offering predictable income.

  • Seasonal rentals may achieve higher peak returns but face lower occupancy rates and greater competition, requiring more active management to remain profitable.


7. Which Option Makes More Financial Sense in 2025?

Choosing between seasonal (short-term) and annual (long-term) rentals depends on location, investor goals, risk tolerance, and management capacity. In 2025, market conditions, regulatory trends, and occupancy rates highlight distinct advantages for each strategy.

Seasonal Rentals: High Potential, High Effort

Best Fit: Properties in high-tourism locations where owners are willing to actively manage rentals and seek higher returns.

  • Pros: Higher upside, potential for significant revenue during peak seasons.

  • Cons: Greater income volatility, stricter regulatory oversight, higher management workload, and increased operational costs.

Annual Rentals: Stability and Simplicity

Best Fit: Investors seeking stable income, minimal effort, and risk-averse approaches.

  • Pros: Consistent cash flow, fewer regulatory hassles, lower management costs, and high occupancy rates.

  • Cons: Limited upside compared to seasonal rentals; returns generally capped at market rent levels.

Hybrid or Diversified Approach

Some investors may find a combination strategy optimal. For example, owning multiple units—one geared toward tourists and another for long-term tenants—can balance risk and return, providing both higher seasonal upside and steady annual income. This approach leverages market opportunities while mitigating individual property risk (Green Forest Capital).

Key Takeaway

In 2025, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Investors should evaluate property location, desired income stability, management willingness, and tolerance for regulatory and market risks before choosing between seasonal, annual, or hybrid rental strategies.


Seasonal vs. Annual Rentals in 2025: Finding the Right Strategy

In 2025, real estate investors face a choice between seasonal (short-term) rentals and annual (long-term) rentals, each offering distinct advantages and trade-offs. Understanding these differences is essential for maximizing returns while managing risk.

Seasonal Rentals: High Revenue, High Involvement

Seasonal rentals—especially standout or luxury properties—can generate significantly higher revenue during peak periods. Premium amenities and prime locations allow owners to command top nightly rates, potentially yielding hundreds of thousands in annual revenue. However, this higher earning potential comes with heavier management responsibilities, including guest communication, frequent cleaning, dynamic pricing, and maintenance.

Seasonal rentals also incur additional costs such as platform fees, specialized insurance, and furnishing upgrades, and they are often subject to stricter regulations, including permit requirements and occupancy limits in certain cities.

Annual Rentals: Steady Income, Low Effort

In contrast, annual rentals offer predictable income, minimal management, and lower operational costs. Tenants usually sign long-term leases, reducing turnover and associated expenses. Insurance is generally less costly, and regulatory oversight is simpler compared to short-term rentals. While returns may be more modest, annual rentals provide stability and ease of use, appealing to risk-averse investors or those seeking passive income.

Finding the Right Strategy

Your ideal rental strategy should reflect:

  • Risk tolerance: Will you prioritize high upside or stable returns?

  • Location: High-tourism areas favor seasonal rentals; residential neighborhoods favor annual leases.

  • Capacity for involvement: Do you have the time and resources to manage frequent guest turnover?

  • Long-term goals: Are you focused on cash flow consistency or maximum revenue potential?

For many investors, a blended or hybrid approach—mixing seasonal and annual rentals across different properties—can provide the most balanced path forward, combining higher earning potential with steady, reliable income.




Sources: 



Comments

bottom of page